Match statistics snapshot
- Chapecoense-sc created the clearer chances on xG (1.91 vs 1.09, Δ 0.82).
- Chapecoense-sc fired more attempts (18 vs 11 shots).
- Chapecoense-sc was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.91Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.09 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 380Lead | Accurate passes | 322 |
| 440Lead | Total passes | 405 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| -0.51 | Goals prevented | -0.51 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.