Match statistics snapshot
- Chapecoense-sc fired more attempts (20 vs 11 shots).
- Chapecoense-sc was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 27%).
- Chapecoense-sc held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Vitoria |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Vitoria |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 296Lead | Accurate passes | 249 |
| 368Lead | Total passes | 314 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Vitoria |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Vitoria |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Vitoria |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 6 | Yellow cards | 4Lead |