Match statistics snapshot
- Chapecoense-sc created the clearer chances on xG (2.15 vs 1.45, Δ 0.70).
- Chapecoense-sc fired more attempts (25 vs 15 shots).
- Vitoria was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Vitoria |
|---|---|---|
| 2.15Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.45 |
| Offsides | ||
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Vitoria |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 282Lead | Accurate passes | 204 |
| 353Lead | Total passes | 277 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Vitoria |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Vitoria |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| -0.52 | Goals prevented | -0.52 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Vitoria |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |