Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 42%).
- Charlotte held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 3Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 423Lead | Accurate passes | 252 |
| 491Lead | Total passes | 333 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 19Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.