Match statistics snapshot
- Charlotte created the clearer chances on xG (2.94 vs 1.44, Δ 1.50).
- Charlotte fired more attempts (19 vs 18 shots).
- Charlotte was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 39%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 2.94Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.44 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 13 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 18 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 346 | Accurate passes | 478Lead |
| 411 | Total passes | 549Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| -0.13 | Goals prevented | -0.13 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.