Match statistics snapshot
- Charlotte created the clearer chances on xG (1.47 vs 0.60, Δ 0.87).
- Charlotte fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- Charlotte was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 1.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.60 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 317 | Accurate passes | 403Lead |
| 396 | Total passes | 480Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 27 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 6 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.