Match statistics snapshot
- Charlotte created the clearer chances on xG (0.99 vs 0.96, Δ 0.03).
- DC United was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 14%).
- Charlotte held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 0.99Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.96 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 333Lead | Accurate passes | 180 |
| 420Lead | Total passes | 267 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.