Match statistics snapshot
- Charlotte created the clearer chances on xG (2.40 vs 0.45, Δ 1.95).
- Charlotte fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Charlotte was more accurate in front of goal (41% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 2.40Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.45 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 90% |
| 564Lead | Accurate passes | 412 |
| 618Lead | Total passes | 456 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.47 | Goals prevented | 0.47 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.