Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (1.19 vs 1.60, Δ 0.41).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (8 vs 7 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 1.19 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.60Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 4Lead |
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 8Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 295 | Accurate passes | 331Lead |
| 382 | Total passes | 399Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 4Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.