Match statistics snapshot
- Charlotte created the clearer chances on xG (2.01 vs 1.44, Δ 0.57).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 2.01Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.44 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 90% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 453 | Accurate passes | 529Lead |
| 503 | Total passes | 581Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.70 | Goals prevented | -0.70 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.