Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (1.65 vs 1.74, Δ 0.09).
- Charlotte fired more attempts (14 vs 7 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1.65 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.74Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 380 | Accurate passes | 442Lead |
| 446 | Total passes | 506Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.03 | Goals prevented | -0.03 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |