Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (0.96 vs 1.35, Δ 0.39).
- Charlotte fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- Charlotte was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.96 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.35Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 364Lead | Accurate passes | 349 |
| 450 | Total passes | 451Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.