Match statistics snapshot
- New England Revolution created the clearer chances on xG (1.20 vs 1.36, Δ 0.16).
- Charlotte held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Charlotte | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 1.20 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.36Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12 | Shots inside the box | 12 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Charlotte | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 321Lead | Accurate passes | 259 |
| 418Lead | Total passes | 362 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Charlotte | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Charlotte | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Charlotte | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |