Match statistics snapshot
- Charlotte created the clearer chances on xG (2.05 vs 0.38, Δ 1.67).
- Charlotte fired more attempts (18 vs 7 shots).
- New England Revolution was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Charlotte | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 2.05Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.38 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 10Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Charlotte | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 477Lead | Accurate passes | 331 |
| 540Lead | Total passes | 389 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Charlotte | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 1Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Charlotte | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.86 | Goals prevented | 0.86 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Charlotte | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.