Match statistics snapshot
- Charlotte created the clearer chances on xG (1.54 vs 0.44, Δ 1.10).
- Charlotte fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- Orlando City SC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.54Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.44 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 373Lead | Accurate passes | 172 |
| 448Lead | Total passes | 245 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |