Match statistics snapshot
- Orlando City SC created the clearer chances on xG (0.89 vs 1.74, Δ 0.85).
- Orlando City SC fired more attempts (24 vs 9 shots).
- Charlotte was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.89 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.74Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 24Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 30% | Ball possession | 70%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 93%Lead |
| 220 | Accurate passes | 600Lead |
| 280 | Total passes | 646Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.01 | Goals prevented | -0.01 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |