Match statistics snapshot
- Charlotte created the clearer chances on xG (1.37 vs 0.35, Δ 1.02).
- Charlotte fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- Portland Timbers was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 1.37Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.35 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 287 | Accurate passes | 361Lead |
| 373 | Total passes | 442Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |