Match statistics snapshot
- Charlotte created the clearer chances on xG (3.44 vs 0.21, Δ 3.23).
- Charlotte fired more attempts (17 vs 6 shots).
- Toronto FC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 35%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3.44Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.21 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 529Lead | Accurate passes | 295 |
| 597Lead | Total passes | 370 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.