Match statistics snapshot
- Charlotte created the clearer chances on xG (2.23 vs 0.77, Δ 1.46).
- Toronto FC fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Charlotte was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.23Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.77 |
| Offsides | ||
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 87% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 327 | Accurate passes | 435Lead |
| 374 | Total passes | 491Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.10 | Goals prevented | -0.10 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Charlotte | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |