Match statistics snapshot
- Charlton created the clearer chances on xG (1.13 vs 0.80, Δ 0.33).
- Hull City fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Charlton was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Charlton | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 1.13Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.80 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Charlton | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 63% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 170 | Accurate passes | 299Lead |
| 268 | Total passes | 393Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Charlton | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Charlton | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Charlton | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |