Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (16 vs 15 shots).
- Charlton was more accurate in front of goal (73% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Charlton | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 2 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 8 |
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
| 15 | Total shots | 16Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Charlton | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 72%Lead |
| 304Lead | Accurate passes | 289 |
| 429Lead | Total passes | 399 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Charlton | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Charlton | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Charlton | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Fouls | 0 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |