Match statistics snapshot
- Charlton fired more attempts (15 vs 4 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 13%).
- Charlton held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Charlton | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
| 15Lead | Total shots | 4 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Charlton | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 384Lead | Accurate passes | 201 |
| 465Lead | Total passes | 287 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Charlton | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Charlton | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Charlton | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 18Lead | Fouls | 22 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |