Match statistics snapshot
- Charlton was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 33%).
- Reading held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Charlton | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Charlton | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 276 | Accurate passes | 373Lead |
| 365 | Total passes | 462Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Charlton | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Charlton | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Charlton | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |