Match statistics snapshot
- FC Porto created the clearer chances on xG (0.36 vs 2.59, Δ 2.23).
- FC Porto fired more attempts (10 vs 4 shots).
- FC Porto was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chaves | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 0.36 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.59Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chaves | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 25% | Ball possession | 75%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 169 | Accurate passes | 624Lead |
| 224 | Total passes | 691Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chaves | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chaves | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| Goalkeeper saves |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chaves | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.