Match statistics snapshot
- Bournemouth created the clearer chances on xG (1.14 vs 2.22, Δ 1.08).
- Bournemouth fired more attempts (22 vs 16 shots).
- Chelsea was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Bournemouth |
|---|---|---|
| 1.14 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.22Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 13Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Bournemouth |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 457Lead | Accurate passes | 261 |
| 533Lead | Total passes | 320 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Bournemouth |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Bournemouth |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| -0.37 | Goals prevented | -0.37 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Bournemouth |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.