Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (1.99 vs 0.85, Δ 1.14).
- Burnley was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 17%).
- Chelsea held more of the ball (67% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Burnley |
|---|---|---|
| 1.99Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.85 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Burnley |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 533Lead | Accurate passes | 240 |
| 605Lead | Total passes | 302 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Burnley |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Burnley |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.16 | Goals prevented | 0.16 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Burnley |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.