Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (2.37 vs 1.27, Δ 1.10).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (20 vs 12 shots).
- Chelsea was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Everton |
|---|---|---|
| 2.37Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.27 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Everton |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 455Lead | Accurate passes | 165 |
| 542Lead | Total passes | 246 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Everton |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Everton |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Everton |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.