Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (3.08 vs 1.48, Δ 1.60).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Chelsea was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Everton |
|---|---|---|
| 3.08Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.48 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Everton |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 535Lead | Accurate passes | 310 |
| 611Lead | Total passes | 399 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Everton |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Everton |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Everton |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.