Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (0.88 vs 0.44, Δ 0.44).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (10 vs 6 shots).
- Chelsea was more accurate in front of goal (70% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Everton |
|---|---|---|
| 0.88Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.44 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Everton |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 433Lead | Accurate passes | 348 |
| 506Lead | Total passes | 412 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Everton |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Everton |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 0.73 | Goals prevented | 0.73 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Everton |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.