Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (1.13 vs 0.97, Δ 0.16).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Chelsea was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 10%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 1.13Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.97 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 498Lead | Accurate passes | 400 |
| 559Lead | Total passes | 465 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.23 | Goals prevented | 0.23 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |