Chelsea vs FC Noah Match Statistics & xG

Chelsea vs FC Noah Match Statistics & xG | Sportra

Chelsea vs FC Noah match statistics

xG, possession, shots, and full match statistics for Chelsea vs FC Noah in UEFA Europa Conference League.

Match statistics snapshot

Home created the clearer chances on xG (5.80 vs 0.61, Δ 5.19).
Home fired more attempts (31 vs 15 shots).
Home was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 47%).

ChelseavsFC Noah

Attacking

Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.

Home	Statistic	Away
5.80Lead	Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count.	0.61

0Lead	OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines.	2
21Lead	Shots inside the box	7

9Lead	Shots off target	3
18Lead	Shots on target	7

10Lead	Shots outside the box	8
31Lead	Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target.	15

Possession & passing

How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.

Home	Statistic	Away
58%Lead	Ball possession	42%
91%Lead	Pass accuracy	87%
533Lead	Accurate passes	374
586Lead	Total passes	431

Set pieces

Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.

Home	Statistic	Away
4Lead	Corner kicks	3

Defensive & goalkeeping

Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.

Home	Statistic	Away
4	Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced.	5Lead
7	Goalkeeper saves	10Lead
-1.42	Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average.	-1.42

Discipline

Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.

Home	Statistic	Away
9	Fouls	5Lead
	Red cards
0Lead	Yellow cards	2

Tactical insights

Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.

Shooting efficiency

How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.

Home leads this block

3Home

duels won

0Away

Home leads shot accuracy (+24% vs Away)

1
Shot accuracy
Share of attempts that tested the goalkeeper — accuracy vs volume.
Home58%55% share
Away47%45% share
Home leads shot accuracy (+24% vs Away)
2
xG per shot
Average danger per attempt. Higher means better chances, not just more shots.
Home0.18782% share
Away0.04118% share
Home leads shot quality (+360% vs Away)
3
Inside box ratio
How often attacks reached the penalty area — proxy for box penetration.
Home68%59% share
Away47%41% share
Home leads box penetration (+45% vs Away)

Tactical identity

Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.

Home leads this block

2Home

duels won

0Away

Home leads possession efficiency (+589% vs Away)

1
xG per possession %
Chance creation per share of the ball — separates sterile possession from threat.
Home0.10087% share
Away0.01513% share
Home leads possession efficiency (+589% vs Away)
2
Passes per shot
Build-up length before shooting. Higher = more patient circulation; lower = direct vertical play.
Home1940% share
Away2960% share
Away — slower buildup (more passes per shot)

Pressure & control

Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.

Home leads this block

1Home

duels won

0Away

Home leads territorial pressure (+134% vs Away)

1
Attack pressure score
Weighted territorial score: in-box shots (×2) + corners + on-target efforts + blocks forced.
Home6870% share
Away2930% share
Home leads territorial pressure (+134% vs Away)

Defensive

How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.

1Home

duels won

1Away

Home — stronger shot quality allowed

1
xGA per shot conceded
Quality of chances allowed per opponent shot — lower means a compact, limiting defence.
Home0.04118% share
Away0.18782% share
Home — stronger shot quality allowed
2
Save difficulty (xG faced ÷ saves)
xG faced divided by saves made — higher means the keeper faced tougher stops.
Home0.0913% share
Away0.5887% share
Away leads keeper workload (+566% vs Home)

Gameplay profile

Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.

Home leads this block

5Home

duels won

0Away

Home had the edge in 5 of 6 signals in this block.

1
Aggression rating
Fouls and cards combined — physical intensity and risk.
Home9.050% share
Away9.050% share
Even on this measure.
2
Control rating
Possession blended with pass accuracy — control without chaos.
Home52.859% share
Away36.541% share
Home leads (52.8 vs 36.5).
3
Siege pressure
Corners plus in-box shots — sustained pressure around the box.
Home25.071% share
Away10.029% share
Home leads (25.0 vs 10.0).
4
Clinical index (xG/shot)
xG per shot — finishing threat independent of volume.
Home0.18782% share
Away0.04118% share
Home leads (0.187 vs 0.041).
5
Defensive compactness
Inverse of xGA per shot faced — higher means opponents got worse chances.
Home95.954% share
Away81.346% share
Home leads (95.9 vs 81.3).
6
Chaos factor
Fouls, cards, and blocks — how stop-start and disruptive the match felt.
Home13.052% share
Away12.048% share
Home leads (13.0 vs 12.0).

ChelseavsFC Noah

Attacking

Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.

Home	Statistic	Away
5.80Lead	Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count.	0.61

0Lead	OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines.	2
21Lead	Shots inside the box	7

9Lead	Shots off target	3
18Lead	Shots on target	7

10Lead	Shots outside the box	8
31Lead	Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target.	15

Possession & passing

How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.

Home	Statistic	Away
58%Lead	Ball possession	42%
91%Lead	Pass accuracy	87%
533Lead	Accurate passes	374
586Lead	Total passes	431

Set pieces

Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.

Home	Statistic	Away
4Lead	Corner kicks	3

Defensive & goalkeeping

Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.

Home	Statistic	Away
4	Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced.	5Lead
7	Goalkeeper saves	10Lead
-1.42	Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average.	-1.42

Discipline

Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.

Home	Statistic	Away
9	Fouls	5Lead
	Red cards
0Lead	Yellow cards	2

Tactical insights

Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.

Shooting efficiency

How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.

Home leads this block

3Home

duels won

0Away

Home leads shot accuracy (+24% vs Away)

1
Shot accuracy
Share of attempts that tested the goalkeeper — accuracy vs volume.
Home58%55% share
Away47%45% share
Home leads shot accuracy (+24% vs Away)
2
xG per shot
Average danger per attempt. Higher means better chances, not just more shots.
Home0.18782% share
Away0.04118% share
Home leads shot quality (+360% vs Away)
3
Inside box ratio
How often attacks reached the penalty area — proxy for box penetration.
Home68%59% share
Away47%41% share
Home leads box penetration (+45% vs Away)

Tactical identity

Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.

Home leads this block

2Home

duels won

0Away

Home leads possession efficiency (+589% vs Away)

1
xG per possession %
Chance creation per share of the ball — separates sterile possession from threat.
Home0.10087% share
Away0.01513% share
Home leads possession efficiency (+589% vs Away)
2
Passes per shot
Build-up length before shooting. Higher = more patient circulation; lower = direct vertical play.
Home1940% share
Away2960% share
Away — slower buildup (more passes per shot)

Pressure & control

Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.

Home leads this block

1Home

duels won

0Away

Home leads territorial pressure (+134% vs Away)

1
Attack pressure score
Weighted territorial score: in-box shots (×2) + corners + on-target efforts + blocks forced.
Home6870% share
Away2930% share
Home leads territorial pressure (+134% vs Away)

Defensive

How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.

1Home

duels won

1Away

Home — stronger shot quality allowed

1
xGA per shot conceded
Quality of chances allowed per opponent shot — lower means a compact, limiting defence.
Home0.04118% share
Away0.18782% share
Home — stronger shot quality allowed
2
Save difficulty (xG faced ÷ saves)
xG faced divided by saves made — higher means the keeper faced tougher stops.
Home0.0913% share
Away0.5887% share
Away leads keeper workload (+566% vs Home)

Gameplay profile

Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.

Home leads this block

5Home

duels won

0Away

Home had the edge in 5 of 6 signals in this block.

1
Aggression rating
Fouls and cards combined — physical intensity and risk.
Home9.050% share
Away9.050% share
Even on this measure.
2
Control rating
Possession blended with pass accuracy — control without chaos.
Home52.859% share
Away36.541% share
Home leads (52.8 vs 36.5).
3
Siege pressure
Corners plus in-box shots — sustained pressure around the box.
Home25.071% share
Away10.029% share
Home leads (25.0 vs 10.0).
4
Clinical index (xG/shot)
xG per shot — finishing threat independent of volume.
Home0.18782% share
Away0.04118% share
Home leads (0.187 vs 0.041).
5
Defensive compactness
Inverse of xGA per shot faced — higher means opponents got worse chances.
Home95.954% share
Away81.346% share
Home leads (95.9 vs 81.3).
6
Chaos factor
Fouls, cards, and blocks — how stop-start and disruptive the match felt.
Home13.052% share
Away12.048% share
Home leads (13.0 vs 12.0).

Chelsea vs FC Noah Match Statistics & xG

Chelsea vs FC Noah match statistics

Match statistics snapshot

Chelsea vs FC Noah match statistics

Match statistics snapshot

Shot accuracy

xG per shot

Inside box ratio

xG per possession %

Passes per shot

Attack pressure score

xGA per shot conceded

Save difficulty (xG faced ÷ saves)

Aggression rating

Control rating

Siege pressure

Clinical index (xG/shot)

Defensive compactness

Chaos factor

Shot accuracy

xG per shot

Inside box ratio

xG per possession %

Passes per shot

Attack pressure score

xGA per shot conceded

Save difficulty (xG faced ÷ saves)

Aggression rating

Control rating

Siege pressure

Clinical index (xG/shot)

Defensive compactness

Chaos factor