Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (2.19 vs 0.86, Δ 1.33).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (17 vs 14 shots).
- Fulham was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 2.19Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.86 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 442Lead | Accurate passes | 330 |
| 524Lead | Total passes | 423 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |