Match statistics snapshot
- Fulham created the clearer chances on xG (1.12 vs 1.78, Δ 0.66).
- Fulham fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Chelsea was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.12 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.78Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 422 | Accurate passes | 489Lead |
| 506 | Total passes | 567Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| 1.04 | Goals prevented | 1.04 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |