Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (2.35 vs 1.02, Δ 1.33).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Chelsea was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 2.35Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.02 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 429Lead | Accurate passes | 337 |
| 494Lead | Total passes | 415 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 1.19 | Goals prevented | 1.19 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |