Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 44%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 1 | Shots off target | 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target |
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 469Lead | Accurate passes | 426 |
| 559Lead | Total passes | 512 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |