Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea fired more attempts (21 vs 6 shots).
- Inter was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
- Chelsea held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 432Lead | Accurate passes | 354 |
| 476Lead | Total passes | 411 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |