Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (3.13 vs 1.44, Δ 1.69).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (19 vs 4 shots).
- Leeds was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Leeds |
|---|---|---|
| 3.13Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.44 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Leeds |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 92%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 593Lead | Accurate passes | 274 |
| 644Lead | Total passes | 336 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Leeds |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Leeds |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| -0.55 | Goals prevented | -0.55 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Leeds |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |