Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (1.35 vs 1.28, Δ 0.07).
- Liverpool fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Chelsea was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 1.35Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.28 |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 610Lead | Accurate passes | 301 |
| 698Lead | Total passes | 377 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.