Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea fired more attempts (17 vs 7 shots).
- Los Angeles FC was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 35%).
- Chelsea held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 92%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 660Lead | Accurate passes | 329 |
| 718Lead | Total passes | 384 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |