Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (2.95 vs 2.88, Δ 0.07).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (17 vs 15 shots).
- Manchester City was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 53%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 2.95Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.88 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 9 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 377 | Accurate passes | 477Lead |
| 444 | Total passes | 531Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.