Match statistics snapshot
- Manchester City created the clearer chances on xG (1.14 vs 2.29, Δ 1.15).
- Manchester City fired more attempts (18 vs 12 shots).
- Manchester City was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 1.14 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.29Lead |
| 6 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 92%Lead |
| 342 | Accurate passes | 627Lead |
| 407 | Total passes | 685Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 1.14 | Goals prevented | 1.14 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |