Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea fired more attempts (28 vs 7 shots).
- Morecambe was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 29%).
- Chelsea held more of the ball (81% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Morecambe |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 18Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 14 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 28Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Morecambe |
|---|---|---|
| 81%Lead | Ball possession | 19% |
| 92%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 624Lead | Accurate passes | 106 |
| 679Lead | Total passes | 155 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Morecambe |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Morecambe |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Morecambe |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.