Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (1.57 vs 0.74, Δ 0.83).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Chelsea was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Newcastle |
|---|---|---|
| 1.57Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.74 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Newcastle |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 342 | Accurate passes | 424Lead |
| 432 | Total passes | 512Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Newcastle |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Newcastle |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Newcastle |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.