Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (2.46 vs 0.87, Δ 1.59).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (22 vs 16 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 2.46Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.87 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 8 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 519Lead | Accurate passes | 233 |
| 591Lead | Total passes | 306 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 7 |
| 0.98 | Goals prevented | 0.98 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 6 | Yellow cards | 4Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.