Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (2.15 vs 2.05, Δ 0.10).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (21 vs 6 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 2.15Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.05 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 597Lead | Accurate passes | 267 |
| 659Lead | Total passes | 334 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.62 | Goals prevented | 0.62 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.