Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (1.85 vs 0.14, Δ 1.71).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (21 vs 4 shots).
- Pafos was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Pafos |
|---|---|---|
| 1.85Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.14 |
| Offsides | ||
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Pafos |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 95%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 705Lead | Accurate passes | 246 |
| 746Lead | Total passes | 306 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Pafos |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Pafos |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 0.80 | Goals prevented | 0.80 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Pafos |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |