Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (4.13 vs 0.07, Δ 4.06).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (20 vs 4 shots).
- Chelsea was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 4.13Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.07 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 76%Lead | Ball possession | 24% |
| 92%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 649Lead | Accurate passes | 145 |
| 702Lead | Total passes | 213 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.