Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (2.07 vs 0.21, Δ 1.86).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (20 vs 6 shots).
- Shamrock Rovers was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 2.07Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.21 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 73%Lead | Ball possession | 27% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 652Lead | Accurate passes | 196 |
| 719Lead | Total passes | 259 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -2.77 | Goals prevented | -2.77 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.