Match statistics snapshot
- Tottenham created the clearer chances on xG (0.63 vs 1.72, Δ 1.09).
- Chelsea was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 33%).
- Tottenham held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 0.63 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.72Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 354 | Accurate passes | 474Lead |
| 425 | Total passes | 539Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -1.08 | Goals prevented | -1.08 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |