Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (4.22 vs 0.88, Δ 3.34).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (25 vs 13 shots).
- Chelsea was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 4.22Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.88 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 19Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 93%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 692Lead | Accurate passes | 255 |
| 741Lead | Total passes | 312 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.